After ten years ....
20/01/2010 marks the tenth anniversary of the death of Craxi in Italy and, as usual, there are many controversies, certainly those that struck me most is that Di Pietro, who as usual never loses the 'opportunity to keep quiet. The leader of IDV, in fact, the cirticato intervenmto of Minzolini said that the Tg1 "Craxi A statesman does not need rehabilitation," and Di Pietro countered by threatening to sue because Minzolini and denounce the House who is paid by the Fee bias can not afford to tell .... well, now account arises, but Santoro Travaglio and then? When the PDL attacks certain attitudes of the public television was attacked and told that this is a shame, for stone can afford to attack everything and everyone, to dispense free threats and attacks that also have little sense? What
said Minzolini truth is sacrosanct, it is true that Craxi is now part of our history and we should learn to discuss them with greater detachment, because it helps us to appreciate the values \u200b\u200band to detect errors. It 'true that Craxi was a great statesman, as it is undeniable that the crime of carrying Tangentopoli, namely the illegal financing of political parties, was been the subject of an amnesty only two years earlier: a sponge that preserve some and give others. The truth is that a political solution was given a court. And the one who had the courage to ask the question in these terms, that is, Craxi, was sent to the guillotine. For this Craxi would never wear the clothes of the accused. What iol leader says IDV, are serious accusations that they want to end up always on the same side, they said that "Minzolini can not compare to a corrupt Pope Craxi has been repeatedly convicted of corruption res judicata. Money did not end the party, but in their accounts. It also has received billions into the account by All Iberian TV entrepreneur named Silvio. "It riodimensioni Di Pietro and admit that the most prosperous period of his life has gone down in history and we must realize that to be looked at with eyes more detached and objective way, so we realize that Craxi has done much for our generation and for HIS ITALY.
V. Ciolfi
Monday, January 18, 2010
Senegal Refugees Camp
Councillors want the abolition of the PDL Consortium of Reclamation, the Centre-Left says "no"
- In the last City Council of the PDL advisers have presented an agenda in which they asked the Council, the Mayor and Board of commitment in repealing of land reclamation consortiums.
"The majority of Councillors and the Mayor" - PDL advisers attack - "as usual can afford to make fun, in fact their response to our question was at least curious, they said that the consortia do not exist anymore, and now a question arises, what is that tax that all homeowners have found themselves delivered to the mailbox sent by the Union of Towns of the Val di Chiana Senese EDAL reclamation No. 32 Valdichiana country, entitled to charge the consortium management of reclamation district No. 32 Valdichiana country? Now "- continue the PDL Board -" do not believe this administration that underlie most of these toys, as we have stated in> the Council is useless continuare a prendere in giro i cittadini cambiando i nomi ma lasciando sempre la stessa sostanza, infatti in questo caso, come in molti altri, la nostra amministrazione vigliaccamente ha aderito all’Unione dei Comuni della “Valdichiana Senese” che praticamente corrisponde alla vecchia Comunità e Montana e per questo tributo, come per l’ente che lo emette, non era facile mantenere sempre lo stesso nome, quindi è stato cambiato il nome da Consorzio per la Bonifica in “Comprensorio di Bonifica”, ma che modo chiaro è questo di operare? Noi” – concludono i Consiglieri Pdl – “rinnoviamo ancora l’invito di eliminare il tributo e proveremo a ripresentare ancora nel prossimo Consiglio our question, we hope that the majority, at least this time, wants to give a satisfactory answer to this objection and should assume their responsibility in the choices we have not shared and widely debated, even before the fighting attitude of this elegant little left. "
- In the last City Council of the PDL advisers have presented an agenda in which they asked the Council, the Mayor and Board of commitment in repealing of land reclamation consortiums.
"The majority of Councillors and the Mayor" - PDL advisers attack - "as usual can afford to make fun, in fact their response to our question was at least curious, they said that the consortia do not exist anymore, and now a question arises, what is that tax that all homeowners have found themselves delivered to the mailbox sent by the Union of Towns of the Val di Chiana Senese EDAL reclamation No. 32 Valdichiana country, entitled to charge the consortium management of reclamation district No. 32 Valdichiana country? Now "- continue the PDL Board -" do not believe this administration that underlie most of these toys, as we have stated in> the Council is useless continuare a prendere in giro i cittadini cambiando i nomi ma lasciando sempre la stessa sostanza, infatti in questo caso, come in molti altri, la nostra amministrazione vigliaccamente ha aderito all’Unione dei Comuni della “Valdichiana Senese” che praticamente corrisponde alla vecchia Comunità e Montana e per questo tributo, come per l’ente che lo emette, non era facile mantenere sempre lo stesso nome, quindi è stato cambiato il nome da Consorzio per la Bonifica in “Comprensorio di Bonifica”, ma che modo chiaro è questo di operare? Noi” – concludono i Consiglieri Pdl – “rinnoviamo ancora l’invito di eliminare il tributo e proveremo a ripresentare ancora nel prossimo Consiglio our question, we hope that the majority, at least this time, wants to give a satisfactory answer to this objection and should assume their responsibility in the choices we have not shared and widely debated, even before the fighting attitude of this elegant little left. "
Breasts Sore 3 Weeks After Menstruation
The school wants the center-right. The PDL attacks the Democratic Party in the Council Comunale.
In the last city council for the center-Montepulciano group has filed a motion on the national policies of the school, strongly criticizing the national government, the PDL, however, in an 'intervention Councillor Ciolfi, took sides in favor of the Decree Gelmini and described in an analytical measures of the government.
"we can no longer subject to the lies of the Left, it's time that citizens know and understand in depth what are the measures taken "- say the directors of the PDL -" is not true that the measures provide for Government cuts the number of teaching and teacher for next year, some of the urgency to rearrange the resources in the school there, in fact, today 97% of resources are im bent on staff, without investing in innovation, but no one has ever talked about layoffs, or rather we should remember the 500 new hires dell'ann0o in progress only in the Region of Tuscany, we can no longer support a school where he invests only 0.37% building, technological innovation, or security. The cut of 7%, of which we keep hearing about is the result of a rationalization necessary, but will be gradual and spread over three years compared to even the scales of retirement, it is also true that the region of Tuscany, in contrast to other 12 Italian Regions center-right and center-left has not yet activated additional social safety nets, proving once more and a more controversy than to the institutional cooperation in good faith, it's time to stop - continue the Directors - "to say that the full-time will be deleted, is not it, even with the introduction of the single teacher is more staff on hand because no one is laid off, in fact, Tuscany were added 145 full-time classes in more than a total of 3,077 full-time classes and any school that has been sought has not obtained, it is certain that the school must not become just a social safety net, a "place of waiting" parents will be put in place to prevent this, strong social policy alongside the full time they see the school as one of the many people who can give concrete answers to the families .
We agree with the good school for two reasons: 1 - today the school is discriminating who can choose who can not. This is not good. The school is public when offering a public service, but who provides a public service is not necessarily the state. 2 - families must always be able to choose and where is the responsibility of the institutions can not guarantee c0ondozioni equal opportunities. We also believe that the Gelmini decree approached with care and common sense, some inescapable points such as the reintroduction of the vote in conduct to combat bullying, the reintroduction of civics education and evaluation raises a number that more clearly. As for the support this year in Tuscany there are 5650 teachers support more than last year and it is not true that children with disabilities gravi9 are not followed, even in the face del fatto che per il sostegno dei bambini con handicap interviene il Ministero e attiva il sostegno. Noi ” – concludono i Consiglieri – “abbiamo in mente perfettamente la scuola che vogliamo: una scuola dove gli insegnanti non siano al centro dell’attenzione, ma siano il perno del sistema; una scuola dove gli insegnanti progrediscano di carriera in base al merito e non all’anzianità; una scuola autonoma davvero, dove si boccia e si licenzia ma anche dove si premia e si crea un contatto stretto con il territorio costruendo percorsi specifici e suggeriti dal contesto, una scuola che coopera con il territorio; una scuola dove la fami9glia torna protagonista, dove sia il sistema a permettere la scelta e non il portafoglio; a school where the parent has to decide where and educational delegation is not in white school a short, open and non-autistic;.
In the last city council for the center-Montepulciano group has filed a motion on the national policies of the school, strongly criticizing the national government, the PDL, however, in an 'intervention Councillor Ciolfi, took sides in favor of the Decree Gelmini and described in an analytical measures of the government.
"we can no longer subject to the lies of the Left, it's time that citizens know and understand in depth what are the measures taken "- say the directors of the PDL -" is not true that the measures provide for Government cuts the number of teaching and teacher for next year, some of the urgency to rearrange the resources in the school there, in fact, today 97% of resources are im bent on staff, without investing in innovation, but no one has ever talked about layoffs, or rather we should remember the 500 new hires dell'ann0o in progress only in the Region of Tuscany, we can no longer support a school where he invests only 0.37% building, technological innovation, or security. The cut of 7%, of which we keep hearing about is the result of a rationalization necessary, but will be gradual and spread over three years compared to even the scales of retirement, it is also true that the region of Tuscany, in contrast to other 12 Italian Regions center-right and center-left has not yet activated additional social safety nets, proving once more and a more controversy than to the institutional cooperation in good faith, it's time to stop - continue the Directors - "to say that the full-time will be deleted, is not it, even with the introduction of the single teacher is more staff on hand because no one is laid off, in fact, Tuscany were added 145 full-time classes in more than a total of 3,077 full-time classes and any school that has been sought has not obtained, it is certain that the school must not become just a social safety net, a "place of waiting" parents will be put in place to prevent this, strong social policy alongside the full time they see the school as one of the many people who can give concrete answers to the families .
We agree with the good school for two reasons: 1 - today the school is discriminating who can choose who can not. This is not good. The school is public when offering a public service, but who provides a public service is not necessarily the state. 2 - families must always be able to choose and where is the responsibility of the institutions can not guarantee c0ondozioni equal opportunities. We also believe that the Gelmini decree approached with care and common sense, some inescapable points such as the reintroduction of the vote in conduct to combat bullying, the reintroduction of civics education and evaluation raises a number that more clearly. As for the support this year in Tuscany there are 5650 teachers support more than last year and it is not true that children with disabilities gravi9 are not followed, even in the face del fatto che per il sostegno dei bambini con handicap interviene il Ministero e attiva il sostegno. Noi ” – concludono i Consiglieri – “abbiamo in mente perfettamente la scuola che vogliamo: una scuola dove gli insegnanti non siano al centro dell’attenzione, ma siano il perno del sistema; una scuola dove gli insegnanti progrediscano di carriera in base al merito e non all’anzianità; una scuola autonoma davvero, dove si boccia e si licenzia ma anche dove si premia e si crea un contatto stretto con il territorio costruendo percorsi specifici e suggeriti dal contesto, una scuola che coopera con il territorio; una scuola dove la fami9glia torna protagonista, dove sia il sistema a permettere la scelta e non il portafoglio; a school where the parent has to decide where and educational delegation is not in white school a short, open and non-autistic;.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)