In the last city council for the center-Montepulciano group has filed a motion on the national policies of the school, strongly criticizing the national government, the PDL, however, in an 'intervention Councillor Ciolfi, took sides in favor of the Decree Gelmini and described in an analytical measures of the government.
"we can no longer subject to the lies of the Left, it's time that citizens know and understand in depth what are the measures taken "- say the directors of the PDL -" is not true that the measures provide for Government cuts the number of teaching and teacher for next year, some of the urgency to rearrange the resources in the school there, in fact, today 97% of resources are im bent on staff, without investing in innovation, but no one has ever talked about layoffs, or rather we should remember the 500 new hires dell'ann0o in progress only in the Region of Tuscany, we can no longer support a school where he invests only 0.37% building, technological innovation, or security. The cut of 7%, of which we keep hearing about is the result of a rationalization necessary, but will be gradual and spread over three years compared to even the scales of retirement, it is also true that the region of Tuscany, in contrast to other 12 Italian Regions center-right and center-left has not yet activated additional social safety nets, proving once more and a more controversy than to the institutional cooperation in good faith, it's time to stop - continue the Directors - "to say that the full-time will be deleted, is not it, even with the introduction of the single teacher is more staff on hand because no one is laid off, in fact, Tuscany were added 145 full-time classes in more than a total of 3,077 full-time classes and any school that has been sought has not obtained, it is certain that the school must not become just a social safety net, a "place of waiting" parents will be put in place to prevent this, strong social policy alongside the full time they see the school as one of the many people who can give concrete answers to the families .
We agree with the good school for two reasons: 1 - today the school is discriminating who can choose who can not. This is not good. The school is public when offering a public service, but who provides a public service is not necessarily the state. 2 - families must always be able to choose and where is the responsibility of the institutions can not guarantee c0ondozioni equal opportunities. We also believe that the Gelmini decree approached with care and common sense, some inescapable points such as the reintroduction of the vote in conduct to combat bullying, the reintroduction of civics education and evaluation raises a number that more clearly. As for the support this year in Tuscany there are 5650 teachers support more than last year and it is not true that children with disabilities gravi9 are not followed, even in the face del fatto che per il sostegno dei bambini con handicap interviene il Ministero e attiva il sostegno. Noi ” – concludono i Consiglieri – “abbiamo in mente perfettamente la scuola che vogliamo: una scuola dove gli insegnanti non siano al centro dell’attenzione, ma siano il perno del sistema; una scuola dove gli insegnanti progrediscano di carriera in base al merito e non all’anzianità; una scuola autonoma davvero, dove si boccia e si licenzia ma anche dove si premia e si crea un contatto stretto con il territorio costruendo percorsi specifici e suggeriti dal contesto, una scuola che coopera con il territorio; una scuola dove la fami9glia torna protagonista, dove sia il sistema a permettere la scelta e non il portafoglio; a school where the parent has to decide where and educational delegation is not in white school a short, open and non-autistic;.
0 comments:
Post a Comment